Jump to content
  • 0

Outraged by the increase in minimum deposit


theSarayiahpost

Question

26 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Think it should be up to the client but it seems IG are not too interested in that as can be seen from their new platform roll out, but I thought the last minute rushed way they went about letting clients know seems to sum up them up recently!  With brexit/Trump/election everyone gets a few days/week notice of changes, but 150% increase in min deposit a few hours - poor form IG.

Link to comment
  • 0

Seems to me like a quite unreasonable cranking-up of top-up minimum.  Can't see why anyone at IG should think it's a good idea.

 

I guess there are people in the industry to whom £250 is small change.  Just goes to demonstrate the extent of the financial inequality in this country and that it is increasing.

 

I'm not well suited by this change.  In fact I'm a bit pissed-off by it.

 

 

 

Link to comment
  • 0

I have just made a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman.  You need to complain to compliance@ig.com first and wait for their response.  If their response is the same as the one I received they will say you can go direct to the ombudsman now or wait up to 8 weeks for their compliance team to investigate.  I went to the Ombudsman, which is very simple. You just speak to them on the phone and they open a case for you there an then - the number for the ombudsman is 0800 023 4567  and if enough people do that then maybe IG will get the message and it costs IG £500 every time someone makes a complaint to them.

Link to comment
  • 0

Make a complaint Magpie.  If everyone who is unhappy with this - who quite rightly think it is very unreasonable, unfair etc make a complaint to the ombudsman then that hits IG where it hurts, as it costs them £500 every time someone makes a complaint to the Ombudsman.

 

First port of call is to complain to compliance - compliance@ig.com and then wait for their response.  They should then give you the option to go to the ombudsman and then do so - call the ombudsman on 0800 023 4567. You simply make your complaint over the phone. It is that simple.

Link to comment
  • 0

I doff my cap, my spread bet account is credited already with the £100 so maybe worth doing it this way if you don't want to send £250. Follow the instructions for the right acc spreadbet/cfd put your ig acc no. & name.

 

Can't fault this!!

Link to comment
  • 0

Thank you for the experiment. Which bank did you make the transfer from and you don't know whether it will be like that for future deposits.

 

Also, that isn't the point Chris.  It isn't instant and we shouldn't have to jump through hoops or over hurdles in order to give a company our business.  If people were to complain in enough numbers then IG would be forced to retreat as if everyone costs them £500 by going to the Ombudsman - how many complaints would they suffer before it starts hurting them financially. 

Link to comment
  • 0

Hey thesarayiahpost

 

HSBC, the details are logged with them now but it depends on whether it is automatic at IG's end, or manual? Don't know this maybe a moderator can let us know.

 

I didn't like the way they went about it all last minute and sneaky, but this worked for me. If this changes I will update but until then its a solution and only took a few mins.

 

Good luck  

Link to comment
  • 0

Hello all, I just wanted to offer some clarity on the points raised in this post.

 

Firstly, there was no intention of surprising or tricking clients with the new minimum card deposits on our side - it's really not in our interest to do so and we will always carefully consider how best to communicate and implement any changes like this.  I'd welcome any feedback on how you feel we could improve this process of course.

 

One of the main changes, do remember, is that credit card and PayPal payments are now free of charge for depositing funds into your account, something we hope will improve your experience when adding money to trade.

 

Also remember that if you would like to continue with the smaller minimum deposits, you can do so by bank transfer - this hasn't changed.  As bank transfers can take longer to clear (even if you use a faster payment service, there is a more manual process to check and allocate deposits to your account), please always forward us proof of payment so that we can identify and accept your funds as quickly as possible.  If you need any more information on the bank transfer procedure, please just ask.

 

One of the main reasons for the increases to minimum deposits is actually to reduce or avoid the times when a client account falls into margin call, due to insufficient funds.  We're aware that this can be a negative, frustrating or concerning experience, so the more funds you have as a 'buffer' against dropping into a deficit, the less likely you will find yourself on margin call, and the more secure your positions.

 

I hope this provides more information and clarity for you all, but please do let me know any questions you have, or feel free to contact our helpdesk at any time.

 

Thank you,

Hannah

Link to comment
  • 0

Hi Hannah,

 

thanks for your response - the main issue being this clarity should have come a week before you implemented it???? This change appeared 4-5 hours before you made it which appeared sneaky in my mind. You guys give plenty of notice of margin changes ( a week or so) in the case of brexit/elections etc but not this time?

 

I call it as I see it - I tried the bank transfer and it worked fine and I said so, been happy with IG for 10 years and I said as much, not happy with the new platform and I'm going to keep saying that until I'm happy or leave. Didn't like the short notice - if you emailed what you said a week before it would be reasonable notice even if people don't like it.

 

Also the risk of larger deposits is perhaps people will trade larger size instead of understanding risk/margin ,as they see more in their account to trade with possibly negating your altruistic main reason????

 

 

Link to comment
  • 0

Hannah

As I said very bluntly to you on the phone. You are speaking utter rubbish.  The reason why IG did this is to force certain clients from trading with them. That is the only reason.  The so called 'trying to help clients from going into margin' by raising the minimum deposit is incredulous. 

 

Don't try and justify what your firm has just done. It is disgraceful as are your lies.

Link to comment
  • 0

It is disgraceful what they have done. And today they are now scrapping how they calculate the margin if you have a guaranteed stop - basically you have to pay the normal margin requirement regardless - another outrageous step.

 

As IG can't do enough to ***** off its clients.

 

 

Link to comment
  • 0

Yes I have just seen this disgusting new scenario - I think IG are turning into one of the worst spreadbettors - how can a guaranteed stop require more margin than at risk - this is a truly shocking turn of events and I think someone should explain exactly why - who does it help, I mean this is truly anti client to the extreme - what route are you taking IG - if you want to higher net worth clients become a real broker but  you are a taker of bets a bookie, and starting to turn against your client base.

 

I notice in there snidey back hand email they can't offer WHY - funny that. Are IG not trustworthy that they can't commit to actually guarantee a position - I bet its somehow our fault and they are doing it for a higher altruistic purpose.

 

So a new dud platform and a guaranteed position with more margin at risk than should be required - 100% agree Outrageous, weak, snide, disgusting, anti client, man you guys have really set a new low in 2017 - how sad after 10 years!!!

Link to comment
  • 0

I agree with the sentiment. Hard to see how this is justifiable. The helpdesk came up with this rather feeble response to my query - 

 

"Increasing the margin requirement was a business decision taken by our executives. By doing so we are decreasing the risk for clients as it limits the amount of leverage that can be taken on."

 

As you suspected, the 'altruistic' rationale is provided...

Link to comment
  • 0

My last post was deleted by IG for being aggressive! Sorry if I hit a nerve with such sensitive characters. As I pointed out this is what IG are with their new 2017 client friendly and loving strategy.

 

This has been quite a year - a new FABULOUS platform with no issues & everyone loving it, and now change in the way you can fund your account with zero notice(marvelous) and a guaranteed position you have to pay margin more than you risk which is the icing on the cake - Well done IG. You guys ROCK da boat, its like spreadbet heaven all fluffy, great and 100% non-aggressive!!!

 

 

Link to comment
  • 0

Hi Val,

 

you only need to send that much by card. If you set up a bank transfer you can send smaller amounts if you want. Just go to payments section and read ALL of the instructions about bank transfer especially the part about your name & IG acc number for reference, making sure you send to the correct acc CFD/shares or spreadbet as the acc nubers are different. You can send any amount and once set up with your bank with IG as a payee its pretty easy and if I send it now 9.30pm you can normally use it tomorrow morning - so not instant but ok for my purposes.

 

Plenty of other spreadbettors, but you have to do your own due diligence on them.

 

Cheers

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Sainsburys full year earnings and Unilever’s first quarter trading update both say the same thing, UK consumers are in for higher prices. The war in Ukraine, supply chain issues and the effects of ongoing Covid all to blame.      
    • US Dollar (DXY) Daily Price and Analysis US Q1 GDP may stall the greenback’s advance. A 20-year high nears for the US dollar. The multi-month US dollar rally continues with the greenback printing a fresh high today ahead of the first look at US Q1 GDP at 12.30 GMT. The US dollar basket (DXY) has been boosted by renewed weakness in the Euro and the Japanese Yen, as investors move from lower-yielding to higher-yielding currencies, while safe-haven flows continue to benefit the greenback. The US growth release later in the session is expected to show a sharp slowdown from the robust Q4 figure of 6.9%. The markets are currently pricing in growth of just 1% for the first three months of this year, with the slowdown mainly due to a reduction in inventory accrual over the quarter. This release is unlikely to move the greenback, unless there is a large miss or beat, as the Fed believe that 2022 US growth will be robust enough to let them tighten monetary policy sharply without damaging the economy. The latest US Core PCE data – the Fed’s preferred inflation reading – is released on Friday and this may have more effect on the US dollar than today’s GDP data. For all market moving economic data and events, see the DailyFX Calendar. The ongoing US dollar rally has been aided by weakness across a range of G7 currencies including the Euro, the Japanese Yen, and the British Pound. The Euro continues to battle with lowly growth expectations, exacerbated by energy concerns, the British Pound is mired by weak economic data, while the Japanese Yen is in freefall as the BoJ continues with its ultra-loose monetary policy.   The US dollar continues to press higher and looks set to break above 103.96, the March 2020 high. Above here the US dollar would be back at levels last seen nearly two decades ago. The March resistance will likely hold in the short-term, especially with month-end portfolio rebalancing at the end of the week, but US dollar strength is set to continue in the months ahead. USDOLLAR (DXY) WEEKLY PRICE CHART – APRIL 28, 2022 {{THE_FUNDAMENTALS_OF_BREAKOUT_TRADING}} What is your view on the US Dollar – bullish or bearish?   Apr 28, 2022 | DailyFX Nick Cawley, Strategist
    • While Tesla has nothing directly to do with Elon Musk buying Twitter - TSLA stock closed down 12% on news that Musk may have to sell stock and use other holdings to stand against the loan to finalise the purchase of the social media giant.        
×
×
  • Create New...